Friday, August 21, 2020

Suicide in the Military Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Self destruction in the Military - Research Paper Example Recorded armed force self destruction rates Studies show that the pace of self destruction in the military is like the extent of self destruction in everybody of the US. â€Å"Three percent of the complete passings in the nation are brought about by suicide† (Lineberry and O’Connor 1). As indicated by the investigation, more guys end it all contrasted with females in the military. â€Å"Above 90 percent self destruction cases are brought about by men† (Lineberry and O’Connor 1). Before the year 2003, the pace of armed force self destruction was lower, in contrast with 2012 and 2013. This is a result of the impacts of the Iraq war. In the year 2008, the investigation results demonstrated that the pace of self destruction was 20 in each 100000 armed force individuals in the US. In the year 2010, the rate expanded to 31 for each 100000members. Reasons for the military self destruction Researchers have distinguished different reasons for the high pace of self destruction in the military. A portion of the causes involve the exceptional military exercises, battles, and arrangement. The referenced conditions generally lead to discouragement or mental issues. Battle and organization impacts Based on the reports during the military screening, most individuals from the military experience mental torment. A few individuals become discouraged and restless during the procedure. Therefore, they wind up mishandling substances so as to ease the strain. Studies affirm that different mental issue, for example, â€Å"depression and maltreatment of substance are associated with the force and the measure of battle time† (Lineberry and O’Connor 1). Sadness and medication misuse are central point that cause self destruction in the military, yet in addition in everybody of the nation. Scientists have related organization with forceful practices and medication abuse. â€Å"Aggression and impulsivity are among the hazard elements of suicideâ₠¬  (Lineberry and O’Connor 1). Because of the ongoing high event of war, there have been numerous organizations in the US armed force. This has come about into mental sicknesses among the military individuals, which has thusly expanded the self destruction rate. Studies affirm that military individuals with one organization experience less mental impacts contrasted with those with more than one sending. Relationship among's self destruction and clinical consideration use Studies affirm that the quantity of armed force individuals looking for clinical assistance because of mental ailments is decidedly corresponded with the extent of self destruction. For example, between the year 2003 and 2008, the military individuals with â€Å"psychiatry ailments expanded from 116 to 216 for each 100000 people in the US army† (Lineberry and O’Connor 1). A similar report additionally affirmed that the pace of self destruction likewise expanded during that time. The clinical re port likewise indicated that the majority of the â€Å"army individuals don't utilize clinical administrations because of a paranoid fear of stigmatization† (Lineberry and O’Connor 1). A few people who test constructive for mental turmoil in centers as a rule experience disgrace that is likewise a significant reason for self destruction. Rest aggravation Researchers have additionally recognized rest unsettling influence as a reason for self destruction. Rest issue â€Å"cause other mental issue, for example, misery and anxiety† which are self destruction hazard factors (Lineberry and O’Connor 1). Clinical specialists found that â€Å"those determined to have a sleeping disorder generally endeavored self destruction after some time† (Lineberry and O’Connor 1). Self destruction anticipation approaches Various techniques can help in the avoidance of self destruction among armed force individuals. One of

Monday, July 13, 2020

Feature Highlight EasyBib Title Page Maker

Feature Highlight EasyBib Title Page Maker (0) Have you ever struggled with formatting the title page for your paper? Are you unsure of what types of information you should include? is here to help! With the EasyBib Title Page Maker, you can create a title page in MLA format, APA format, or Chicago/Turabian citation styles simply by filling out a few information fields. With this tool, it’ll only take you minutes to make your title page. Here’s how to access and use the Title Page Maker: Go to easybib.com. Open the menu in the upper left corner and select “Title Page Maker.” Fill out the form shown. Click “Create Title Page” when you’re done and does the rest! Note: Be sure to use the capitalization rules that are set by the citation style you choose. For example, in an APA citation, only the first principle word and proper nouns are capitalized. Try out the Title Page Maker by clicking on this link: http://titlepage.easybib.com/

Wednesday, May 20, 2020

What is Philosophy Essay - 1828 Words

The subject of Philosophy and its subcategories have been widely discussed in both the Western and non-Western world albeit with different focuses. Philosophy includes many different subfields involving investigation into our existence. These subfields include epistemology, ethics, logic, metaphysics, philosophy of science, social and political philosophy, and Metaphilosophy. Epistemology focuses on the study of Knowledge, also known as â€Å"Theory of Knowledge†. Ethics involves the study of moral values and rules, Logic; the study of reasoning. Metaphysics is the study of being and knowing also known as the principles of reality. The Philosophy of Science analyzes the nature and results of scientific inquiry. Social and Political Philosophy†¦show more content†¦These methods of thinking include Critical, Rational, Systematic, Reflective, and normative thinking. Each of which helps find a conclusion or truth. The method of critical thinking explores what it means to be critical and how we think critically. Critical thinking can be defined as an approach to ideas from the standpoint of deliberate consideration. Philosophy differs from Religion in that this critical thinking is a primary characteristic used in Western Philosophy. Religion is a belief and way of life while philosophy is the knowledge or understanding of life. In Greek Philo means love of and Sophy, wisdom. Hence philosophy is most directly the love of wisdom. Non-western Philosophy incorporates both science and religon to answer questions. Furthermore, all Sciences are subsets of philosophy. Philosophy represents the mind, a process of thinking and religion, a process of faith. Philosophy is Dogma while Religion is a code of conduct revealed upon mankind through revelation. Furthermore religion depends upon a superior being or unknown force (think god). Because of this, when a philosophy is codified into rituals and faith, it becomes a religion. Religion tends to back away from rational discourse, as opposed to Philosophy, which is all about rational discourse and critical thinking. Similar to critical thinking, the method of rational thinking interprets how we think rationally. Logic plays a specialized role in rational thinking. Rational thinkingShow MoreRelatedWhat is Philosophy?1500 Words   |  6 PagesPHIL 201 Study Guide Lesson 1: What is Philosophy? Points 1) Three preliminary qualifications in studying philosophy – 1) it is impossible to distinguish rigidly and conclusively between what counts as a philosophical problem and what does not – borderline cases / 2) none of the characteristics we shall examine is unique to philosophy; each by itself may be found in another discipline (approximations that, when applied collectively, describe reasonably adequately a broad range of philosophicalRead MoreWhat Are Philosophy and Islamic Philosophy824 Words   |  3 PagesThis paper is designed about the discussion on what is philosophy and what is Islamic philosophy and philosophy itself. In first discussion is explain about the philosophy and the second discussion is discuss about the Islamic Philosophy. Generally, philosophy is the study of general and fundamental problems, such as those connected with reality, existence, knowledge, values, reason and so forth. First and foremost, the term of philosophy is derived from combination two Greek words which is ‘Philos’Read MoreWhat Is Your Philosophy?1015 Words   |  5 PagesWhat is your philosophy? First let us define and understand what philosophy means. Philosophy is a basic concept examined through using specific spheres of knowledge. The concepts as examined are reality, existence, truth, freedom, and causality. Philosophy is broken down into many areas of interest. We will explore them with defining each, providing a description for approaches to philosophical questions as well as explaining how philosophy and culture interaction in terms of developmentRead MoreWhat Is Leadership Philosophy?1238 Words   |  5 PagesWhat is leadership philosophy? According to Col William DeMarco, a leadership philosophy is similar to an organizational mission statement but on an individual level. â€Å"It lets people know what you expect, what you value, and how you will act; with the additional benefit of making the organization more productive like a compass it helps keep you, the leader, on course.†1 This paper will cover three elements. I will begin by discussing my personal leadership philosophy and my opinion on â€Å"a boss vsRead MorePhilosophy Is What You Know1314 Words   |  6 PagesBritish logician Bertrand Russel once opined, â€Å"Science is what you know. Philosophy is what you don t know†. Russell’s logic assumes philosophical discussion to be mere speculation. Russell’s logic aside, philosophies serve to provide an academic field its notional base. Serving as overarching theories, hypothetical philosophies are comprised of foundational principles and precepts. Like any conjectural philosophy, this one will speculate about effective leadership’s foundational precepts and principlesRead MoreWhat Is My Educational Philosophy?890 Words   |  4 PagesWhat is my educational philosophy? After reading about so many different philosophers in education this semester, I have come to agree and disagree with a lot of different ideas. If I had to only pick one philosopher and their ideas I wouldn’t be able to. I don’t really have any fresh or original ideas on education. I would have to say my philosophy is a mixture between all the different philosophers and things I have learned this semester in class and things that were s elf-taught. When tryingRead MoreWhat Are The Types Of Research Philosophies?1115 Words   |  5 Pagesquestions. 3.1 Research philosophy Whenever providing a research methodology, it is important to determine the exact philosophy that will be used in the research. There are two main types of research philosophies. These are analytical or descriptive philosophies. An analytical research philosophy is a type of research where the investigator is able to critically evaluate the variables and influence them to determine his research questions. The alternative is a descriptive philosophy where the investigatorRead MoreWhat Is Philosophy According to Socrates Essay970 Words   |  4 PagesWhat is philosophy according to Socrates? Philosophy is an academic subject that exercises reason and logic in an attempt to understand reality and answer fundamental questions about knowledge, life, morality, virtue, and human nature. The original word for philosophy comes from the ancient Greek word philosopha, which means love of wisdom. Although Socrates himself never claimed to have any answers to the questions he raised, his views and methods of philosophy became the foundations of whatRead MoreTo What Extent Is Conservatism a Philosophy of Imperfection?1675 Words   |  7 PagesConservatism does not have one single viewpoint or stance on human nature or imperfection as Conservatism as a whole encompasses different strands or beliefs within it. For example One Nation conservatives have a different philosophy on human imperfection than New Right conservatives do. One Nation conservatives hold the belief that we as humans are: greedy and have a limited capacity for altruism, a complex mix of emotions and contradictory motivations making us irrational, not totally consistentRead MoreWhat I Learned in Philosophy Class1540 Words   |  6 Pageswith a quick story. Going into this semester, I knew absolutely nothing about philosophy, and I thought that with this class being a Gen Ed, that it was going to be a cakewalk on my way to just getting it out of the way. I quickly learned how wrong that my mind frame going into the class, as it was quickly finding itself digging me a deep hole to crawl into, grade wise. I never realized how deep the roots of philosophy ran, from government to art. This class has opened my eyes to the world around

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

The Reality Of Animalism In Animal Farm, By George Orwell

The political fiction novel, Animal Farm, by George Orwell, opens with the farm’s prize pig giving a speech. Old Major discusses his dream where animals don’t have to live under the harsh rule of humans, and are completely free. He preaches equality among animals, where no animal hurts another. â€Å"No animal must ever kill any other animal. All animals are equal† (11). The concept of a world in which animals were in power came to be known as Animalism. Following Old Major’s death, the animals of the farm tried to implement his dying vision of Animalism. However, the idea of Animalism and the reality of Animalism greatly differed. The notion of a society without conflict and the evil of humans was too good to be true, as life on the farm soon†¦show more content†¦The most twisted part of this is that he used the money from selling Boxer to buy whiskey for the pigs. The foundations of Animalism stress that no harm should come to an animal by anoth er animal, yet in reality, Napoleon ferociously slaughtered his fellow animals. In his speech, Old Major stressed the fact that animals should not come to resemble humans in any way. â€Å"We must not come to resemble [Man]† (11). While this seems simple enough, the reality was that the pigs came to live in the farmhouse, wear human clothing, sleep in beds, and eat human vittles. These actions broke commandments three, four, and five. â€Å"No animal shall wear clothes† (24), â€Å"No animal shall sleep in a bed† (24), and, â€Å"No animal shall drink alcohol† (25). The pigs were extremely hypocritical because they were the ones that created the commandments in the first place, only to blatantly stray from them. The pigs even painted over the commandments to change them to their benefit. For example, Squealer was caught changing, â€Å"No animal shall drink alcohol† (25), to â€Å"No animal shall drink alcohol to excess† (109). This was after the pigs discovered the humans’ stash of whiskey. Despite catching Squea ler in the act of changing the commandment, the animals couldn’t understand that he was doing something wrong, so they thought nothing of it and soon forgot. Orwell wrote that the animals didn’t understand what Squealer was doing so that they wouldn’t get too suspicious. Another commandment thatShow MoreRelatedGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm942 Words   |  4 PagesGeorge Orwells Animal Farm (1945) is an illustrious political novella which delineates the fact that the Utopian Ideology of communism is not perfect. Orwells eagerness to express his view on the Russian Republic led him to produce his satirical and metaphoric masterpiece; Animal Farm. The fictitious text based on the events manifest in the Russian Revolution show how communism fails as power corrupts minds, displayed in the novella with Animalism. Napoleon, the main protagonist portrays theRead MoreEvaluation Of Animal Farm By George Orwell1101 Words   |  5 PagesAnimal Farm by George Orwell The book Animal Farm by George Orwell was first published in 1945, and the context when it was written plays a huge role in shaping it. It was after the Russian Revolution in which we see Joseph Stalin became the new leader of the Soviet Union. Stalin’s idea and leadership clearly doesn’t impress George Orwell, as this book shows the dark side of Stalin’s system through a group of fictional characters, the animals. Not only that, the book was also able to foresee theRead MoreAnimals Take Over in Animal Farm by George Orwell1370 Words   |  6 PagesIn the novel â€Å"Animal Farm† by George Orwell, the animals take over the farm and develop their own independent society. Just as it happened during the Russian Revolution of 1917. George Orwell underlies the tension between the oppressed and the exploiting classes between the condescending ideals and harsh realities of socialism. During the course of the literary piece by George Orwell makes it clear how the animals are mistreated by â€Å"Mr. Jones â€Å", because of this treatment they are receiving; OldRead MoreAnimalistic Persuasion: Orwells Animal Farm Essay937 Words   |  4 Pages The story Animal Farm is one that creates a web of persuasion between its characters. Animal Farm is a satirical story where a boar on the farm, named major, calls the animals together for a meeting where he addresses the humans as vile and cruel. After the lead pig dies, two younger pigs take over and take over preparations for a rebellion. The pigs create the â€Å"seven commands of animalism† where â€Å"all animals are equal† (Orwell 33). In order to educate them, Snowball, one of the pigs in chargeRead More The Warnings in George Orwells Animal Farm Essay1248 Words   |  5 PagesGeorge Orwells Animal Farm George Orwells goal in writing the novel Animal Farm was to portray the events surrounding the Russian revolution that took place in 1917. Orwells tale of Animal Farm is seemingly a story of how a group of farmyard animals plot to overthrow their owner and seize control of the land. The novel seems to be a simple story, however Orwell wrote this book as an allegory, a story that has a clear secondary meaning beneath is literal sense. Everything in Animal Farm isRead MoreThe Obstruction Of Power In George Orwells Animal Farm931 Words   |  4 PagesThe Obstruction of Power Throughout Animalism â€Å"The pigs did not actually work, but directed and supervised the others. With their superior knowledge it was natural that they should assume the leadership†- Pages 27-28. The book that this is present in, is Animal Farm by George Orwell. George Orwell wrote Animal Farm hoping his readers would see the comparison to the Soviet Union through allegory, and symbols. The Animal Farm was ultimately a failure because of power; more specifically, because theRead MoreCharacteristic Of A Lion In Animal Farm, By George Orwell1668 Words   |  7 Pagesemotions such as if someone is larger, then they are depicted as dominant, or a person who smiles is considered friendly. The same process can happen in relation to the animal kingdom. A lion is considered noble or brave. When a person thinks about animals, they consider different human characteristics. In Animal Farm, by George Orwell, the book portrays these characteristics by creating pigs as leaders and dogs as followers, and hor ses as hard workers. This book is read in schools throughout the countryRead MoreCharacter Analysis Of George Orwells Animal Farm923 Words   |  4 PagesAnimal Farm Character Analysis Essay â€Å"Old major†¦ was so highly regarded on the farm that everyone was quite ready to lose an hour’s sleep in order to hear what he had to say† (Orwell 1). The author, George Orwell, portrayed Old Major as the wisest of all the animals on the farm, and without being said, Major was a big part of Animal Farm. In fact, he influenced the lives of all the animals with just one speech. On the day of this speech, Major taught all the animals his wise ideas in a kind supportingRead MoreTotalitarianism in Orwells Mind Essay1053 Words   |  5 Pagesauthor George Orwell hates in government. 1984, a book written by Orwell, depicts a society called Oceania, in which unwary citizens are obedient to the Party, a totalitarian regime. Totalitarianism is defined as a political system in which a centralized government does not tolerate any form of political dissent and seeks to control many, if not all, aspects of public and private life. Another one of George Orwell’s books, Animal Farm, is an allegory about the Soviet Union, and in it farm animalsRead MoreMarxist Criticism Is Always Concerned with the Class Struggle in History.1525 Words   |  7 Pagesbring about a classless society. Thus the reason I chose to study George Orwells Animal Farm is because its characters share (originally) this same ambition. Animal Farm represents the oppressed masses rising up and forming a classless society of their own. While offering a critique of communism in general, the book also serves to act as a mirror of Soviet Russia under Stalin. As reflected throughout the text, it was no secret Orwell considered Russia, and consequently Communism, a counter-revolutionary

Reading a Book or Watching Its Adaptation Which Is Better Free Essays

Reading a book or watching its adaptation:  Which  is better? When a film is made from a book, it is called  Ã‚  an adaptation. From the beginning, film-makers have  made films based on novels, short stories, biographies and plays;  of these adaptations,  Ã‚  novels  have always been the most popular choice (Difference). And what are the main differences between books and adaptations? Films have limited time, whereas books can be lengthy, so books can develop more of a plot and characterization. We will write a custom essay sample on Reading a Book or Watching Its Adaptation: Which Is Better? or any similar topic only for you Order Now A classic complaint about movie versions concerns the omission of material that the reader finds important. If the director must make a film that is the proper length for a theatrical release, there is no way to include everything, especially when it comes from a long novel. Some people consider this an advantage of adaptations; others, on the contrary, find it a great disadvantage. Here are two opinions of people discussing Peter Jackson’s Fellowship of the Ring in the comments on â€Å"WiseGEEK† website. Anon272367 writes: â€Å"Imagine, for example, a â€Å"Fellowship of the Ring† [sic] movie that covered every single damn detail in the book. Trust me when I say this: I wouldn’t watch it† (Better). His opponent, anon260109, writes: â€Å"Jackson’s ear was deaf to Tolkien’s elaborately crafted back story of ancient mysteries and he threw away their music, not realising that the books are unlike any other fantasy novel in that they were written by a man who constructed them on an intimate knowledge of the Old English language, mythology and storytelling† (Better). One more difference is that books require the reader to use his or her imagination to visualize what is happening while films normally visualize it for the viewer. Films leave little to viewers’ imaginations. When reading, a person is creating his or her own movie in a sense, and he or she decides many of the important parts: how the characters speak, what they look like, and what their surroundings look like. Hr30 expresses the same opinion: â€Å"Often when a writer uses description, the way I imagined it is far different to the way it is interpreted in the film. I think the beauty of books is that you can develop your own way of thinking about them, whereas often (though not always) a film directs you into one way of thinking† (Prefer). Films have one thing that is a book cannot: sound. Music, environmental sounds and sound effects make adaptations thrilling and interesting. Even some boring (in my personal opinion) episodes from books, such as battles of war, look fascinating in films. There is no right answer to the question stated in the title of this text, and there is no common opinion. There are people who prefer books; for example lou1987 wrote the following: â€Å"I prefer the books. I suppose, [sic] one of the main reasons is that the books are what the films are based on, and so contain far more detail than can ever be portrayed in a film. Also, films present to you what is happening visually, and for me, I prefer to read a book and create the setting and build characters in my head† (Prefer). Some people, though there are few of them, choose films. Anon122072 writes: â€Å"i [sic] think movies are better because it’s easier with a visual aid† (Better). But the majority of people like both books and their adaptations. Anon272367: â€Å"Reading for me is not more enjoyable than watching a movie. They are on 100 percent equal footing. Why would anyone ever in a million years walk into a theater and expect a similar experience to opening a book? It’s foolish to expect them to be the same† (Better). Sometimes people who prefer books admit that there are good adaptations: â€Å"I guess what I’m trying to say is that sometimes  movies  do  get it right. There are quite a few examples that fall into this category: The  Wizard of Oz,  The Lord of the Rings, and  Gone With the Wind  are ones that spring to mind† (Page). To my mind, books are better than films because watching a movie is almost always a passive experience, so there is far less thought process involved. I like closing the book and thinking about the problems it deals with. Don’t get me wrong; I love watching movies, but nine times out of ten, watching movie adaptations is disappointing. Sometimes it is bad to read a book before watching its adaptation, but it is even worse to read after you’ve watched  the movie. So I still read books and watch adaptations and try to find something good in every version. Works Cited 1) â€Å"Book Adaptations: From the Page to the Big Screen. † Bookosaur. Web. 17 Nov. 2012 ;http://www. thebookosaur. com/2012/01/book-adaptations-from-the-page-to-the-big-screen/; 2) â€Å"Books vs. Movie Adaptations – which do you prefer? † The Student Room. Web. 17 Nov. 2012 ;http://www. thestudentroom. co. uk/showthread. php? t =1982240; 3) â€Å"What is the difference between books and films? † Kvenno Web. 17 Nov. How to cite Reading a Book or Watching Its Adaptation: Which Is Better?, Papers

Thursday, April 23, 2020

Interruptions in death Review Essay Example

Interruptions in death Review Paper Essay on Interruptions in death The next day, no one has died. Once I threw street money changers. Already moving away slightly to the side, giving the fraudster needed seconds to dissolve in a cool and a little damp air of the Bulgarian streets, I noticed it. Of course, I was hurt lost money, but wonder how could be such a chode somehow smoothed offense. A minute later it was even admiration for the agility of the hands of scammers. One of the passers-by, who saw in what situation I was, but I still think that it was a fellow con artist (already perhaps a retired that it was possible to conclude the calm and some burgher mean it) even took pity on me and invited in cafes and treated at their own expense, he said a little about the stunts and tricks professional money-changers (which is why I suspect it a colleague). From the novel by Josà © Saramago Interruptions in death, which was my first acquaintance with the work of a writer, I still have a similar experience. No, no, no material loss, no disappointment. But Im sure someone very cleve r took into circulation. Who from passers-pity? We will write a custom essay sample on Interruptions in death Review specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Interruptions in death Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Interruptions in death Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer I can even say simpler and cruder. From reading the book Saramago left quite a sizeable impression that I was raped. Again, no negativity. Sex is sex, and I was pleased to get a library orgasm. Thats just obviously not in this intercourse, I was dominant, some passive role was assigned to me. I read the book, but did not feel the usual readers power over the pages, more pages dragged me on and on. And, perhaps, allow myself the third passage of sensations. It seems, reading Saramago, I felt about the same as that of a man caught in a quicksand. Lets finally talk about the novel. As I learned from my early interest in the writer Saramago and from the preface to this particular book, he always says something like this. First, start with a fantastic assumptions, and watches over the laboratory Petri dish as well-stirred bacteria characters. Second, he always says so: slozhnosochinennye huge, complex sentences, periods, refinement, adding in general, filigree philological orgy. Look it offers as the many-domed hydra, or how terrible giant octopus from the sea bottom, which entangle your reader tentacles and dragged away to his lair. And if at first its annoying wildly, then later you realize and on the other and can not be. And like a junkie in breaking tryaseshsya when suddenly another proposal is short and simple. As a bonus the authors spelling dialogue does not stand out, and are not separated from the narrative text In a wonderful New Year at midnight in a lovely Portuguese people stopped dying.. Absolutely. Though head Carry yourself with a shotgun the positive effect will not achieve, however, and especially without the head is not well zazhivesh. Not difficult to imagine what a mess began. Insurers have come up with clever schemes of conservation fees policies. Undertakers require financial assistance from the government, because industry came to an end. Hospitals overflowing with patients, since those who were to die can not do so, but nothing particularly except can not do too compare this with coma. Clergy Clergy so in general, revolve, like snakes in a frying pan, only manage to maintain robes as so, because without death there is no death by death there is no resurrection. There is no peace beyond the grave. No, therefore, the basis of religion. There have, of all the various interesting aspects, I would single out the one that I liked particularly. Saramago though scoffs at the romantic nonsense about immortality, which is teeming with literature. Remember, do not once in the company you did not have the discussion, and that if I was immortal? And often the result was the same well, I would be bored, ah this is immortality, immortality, only the first few hundred years of wondering Saramago plays the fool: And who said that in his immortality, you will be relieved of ailments, from aging, ailments ? But this is how we envision not only immortality, but life itself: It is unfair and cruel wont take the lives of people all at once, not to mention, so to speak, a bad word, no warning, no shouting watch out and admit that this being and unjustifiable atrocity: the number of times I did not give people the time at least to make a will, although in fairness, I note that usually sent in advance of the disease, ailments and ill nesses, which have, however, a kind of a fun twist people are always looking to get rid of them since h then only after a long delay comprehend that this disease the last Actually all this whirl and pandemonium and dedicated to the first third of the book and yet still there has been also an important issue that the elderly-all the same part of the community wanted would be released to the world, well, you know, where all sorts of wills and other housing problem. Well, demand creates supply, the more that death has ceased to carry out their duties solely in the national borders of Portugal. What a marvelous prospect of a tourist orientation Looking at all of this pie, which at times hilariously funny, sometimes realistically scary, I thought that this way will be the entire book an observation, passive Chronicle. Not a bit of it, when Saramago plot turns 180 degrees death again comes into its own, after a seven-month hiatus. And nesurazits wheel and confusion already twisted in the opposite direction at least not less hectic and messy. Burlesque, and only. No, and here Saramago does not sour in uniformity, making the third, the final plot twist that introduces death as a character (yes, thats right, with a small letter, for you mortals have never had to know that there is death!) and then it begins a marvelous romantic phantasmagoria, which go hand in hand life, death and love. This is just a terrific novel. PS Do not repeat my mistakes do not change money with it Repeat my mistake to attach to the work of Josà © Saramago Read the novel Josà © Saramago:. .